10/07/24
This week the High Court (Mr Justice Jay) handed down its decision in Fertré v Vale of White Horse District Council [2024] EWHC 1754 (KB). The Appellant, a French citizen residing in the UK with Pre-Settled Status, had been refused housing assistance by the Council pursuant to rules in domestic legislation.
The Appellant argued that the refusal of her application was contrary to the equal treatment protections in Article 23 of the EU-UK Withdrawal Agreement. Article 23(1) confers equal treatment protection to EU citizens who are residing in the UK “on the basis of” the Withdrawal Agreement. The Appellant argued that the UK’s grant of Pre-Settled Status, made pursuant to powers under Article 18(1) of the Withdrawal Agreement, was a “new residence status” created by the Withdrawal Agreement. On that reasoning, excluding the Appellant from housing assistance under the domestic legislation was discriminatory and incompatible with Article 23 of the Withdrawal Agreement.
The proper ambit of non-discrimination provisions for EU citizens in the UK after Brexit was left unanswered by the Fratila litigation in the Supreme Court and the CG litigation in the CJEU. In recognition of the public interest in the issue, the Court granted permission to four interveners: (1) the Secretary of State for Housing, (2) the3million, (3) the Independent Monitoring Authority (“IMA”), which is the monitoring body appointed under the Withdrawal Agreement, and (4) Shelter.
Mr Justice Jay heard from the parties and interveners on 11 and 12 June 2024. He ultimately dismissed the appeal and agreed with the submissions of the Secretary of State and the IMA as to the construction of the Withdrawal Agreement:
The judgment is here. The IMA’s written submissions are here.
Aarushi Sahore appeared for the IMA, instructed by their in-house legal team.